Thursday, February 28, 2008

Krave #12: The Re-Invention Issue (un-edited)

The "Guess What? You can get it from oral sex too!" was written by Marcus Scott. Marcus Scott
Krave Magazine
“Mouth: The Dangers of Oral Sex”
In a time span that reveres in infidelity and kink, today’s Renaissance man and urban jungle hustler have altered the perceptions of social norms, and in this, their sexual climate. With more knowledge on the dangers of unprotected sex, the modern 21st century Lothario of today are not the free-spirited sexual polymaths they were in the 60s. However, the risks are just as or more dangers than their 60s counterparts.
Described as sexual activities initiated to stimulate the genitalia involving the mouth, which may include but are not limited to the use of the throat, teeth, tongue and lips, oral sex is a sexual act that even bares significant spiritual and cultural influence, cited in Taoism to Greek Mythology. All forms of oral sex include anal-oral sex (or rimming), cunnilingus (oral sex on the female genitalia), fellatio (oral sex on the male genitalia, universal referred to a blow job), tea-bagging (the act of placing a man’s testicles in his partner’s mouth), Ass to mouth (according to sources, a sexual act used for the removal of the penis from the passive partner's anus followed by the immediate insertion of the penis into the passive partner's or another partner's mouth), and lastly, autofellatio (the act of oral sex on one’s own genitalia), although the latter is often referred to as a form of masturbation rather than the act of oral sex. But that’s just it; some of us just don’t see this as sex.
Techniques aside, it is in fact that the human mouth is one of the most unclean places, and oral sex as an activity is an act used throughout an entire body such as the act of passionate kissing. There are many risks in obtaining pleasure as both provider and receiver in the act of oral sex. Most importantly, both parties can risk contributing to or attributing health risks from his partner because of the incidence of viruses, bacteria, parasites, or bugs on or in the mouth, penis, vagina, the anus or the rectum. Perhaps the most common of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs; ailments that have indicative feasibility of transmission between humans or animals by means of sexual contact) include but are not limited to Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Herpes, human papillomavirus (HPV), intestinal parasites, and Hepatitis A, B and C. These aren’t the worst of one’s troubles, according to http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=5822, where a research study at the Malmo University Faculty of Odontology in the College of Malmö, Sweden in 2005, suggested that performing unprotected oral sex on a person infected with the human papillomavirus may increase the risk of oral cancer, because it has 40 different types of viruses and has been associated with cancer of the mouth, cervix or anus. Genital warts may also occur.
In addition to this, the case study “Control Study of Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Cancer” by D'Souza et al., advocate that people who have had more than five oral-sex partners in their given lifetime are 250% more likely to have throat cancers than those who do not participate in oral sex, suggesting that there is a correlation between throat cancer and oral sex. This gives accession to the belief that this is due to the transmission of human papillomavirus or simply because the virus has been involved in the majority of cervical cancers.
According to self-help books like the page-turner “Anal Pleasure and Health” by Jack Morin, Ph.D. and chic “The Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex For Women” by Tristan Taormin, when it comes to anal-oral sex, administering the mouth to the genitals promptly after despositing it to the anus can unconsciously introduce the Escherichia coli (commonly E. coli) into the urethra, initiating a urinary tract infection. While HIV and AIDS aren’t deep-rooted statisically, experts certify that there are still risk of acquiring HIV/AIDS from anal-oral sex.
Channeling a sex educator, every time you have sex, you engage in sexual activity, you’re taking risk. The best way to make sense of this is to maintain a snug, secure and healthy sex life. Of course the most advantageous way of not having to contact STDs is abstinence, however the use of latex or polyurethane condoms and dental dams are by far the best way to secure protection. However, if one wears a condom to loose it can defeat “the barrier.” Wearing it too snug it can risk infection if the condom tears, and leaving 1.5 cm or 3/4 inches of room at the tip for ejaculate is must. Last and most importantly, by claims of the Centers of Disease Control and Pervention (CDC), its best if one avoids the use of oil based lubricants with latex condoms, as the oils can eat holes into the latex.
In today’s society, oral sex is not seen as sex, in fact, its often seen as foreplay, merely an activity used before sex. However, foreplay is merely touching, massaging, caressing, kissing, role play and sometimes, outercourse. To raise eyebrows, can one catch an STD by a massage?
Sources:
Centers of Disease Control and Pervention (CDC) website—http://www.cdc.gov/
“Anal Pleasure and Health” by Jack Morin, Ph.D.
“The Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex For Women” by Tristan Taormin
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=5822
http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/hardin/md/std.html
http://www.avsf.bm/STD%20facts.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexually_transmitted_disease#Condoms

"On The Down Low" with Deondray Gossett by Marcus Scott (Fahari-Libertad)






What does "down-low" mean to you?
[Deondray Gossett] Traditional Meaning: Slang term for anything that's a secret, i.e., "I'm proposing to Cynthia. Don't tell her though. I wanna keep it on the down low." Down Low as in "below the radar" and out of people's consciousness.Media Hype Definition: Any black man who is married to a woman but also secretly sleeps with men.My Definition: Men of color who lead double lives. They may have wives, boyfriends, or be single. The bottom line is that they are refusing to acknowledge that they are gay or bisexual. The "DL" doesn't always involve men cheating on women with other men. The DL also includes men who may be in committed relationships with other men, but are pretending to be straight for the outside world. DL also includes men who don't deny that they have sex with men, but call themselves DL because they don't want the negativeconnotations that come with the term "gay". Many DL men feel as if the gay label emasculates them and conjures up images of rainbow flags, pride parades, over-the-top sexual practices, chaps, cross-dressing, etc. They choose to be called DL or MSM (Men Who Sleep with Men) because these titles/labels, they feel, keep their masculinity in tact and unthreatened.
Were you a former male on the "down low" and if so how many years have you and your partner been on the "down-low"?
[Deondray Gossett] Not in the sensational sense of the term. Quincy and I were on the "DL" for the first seven years of our relationship because we didn't want some of our family or friends knowing. Both of us come from very strong religious/homophobic families, and from very early ages we picked up cues from our families that said homosexuality was deplorable and would not be tolerated under any circumstance. When I was 16, my grandmother (father's mother) caught me and my first boyfriend lip-lockedand told me that if I didn't seek psychological help that she would disown me. So, everything I did from that point on was to accommodate my grandmother, father, mother, and siblings to be the boy they all wanted and demanded for me to be. After Quincy and I became more independent and less reliant on family for financial support, we started coming out to close friends and family members; however my mom's side of the family had known of our relationship from the beginning. Quincy's family and my father's side had no idea. We pegged them to be less tolerant than my mom's side of the family.
Would you qualify "down low" as deception, if so, why?
[Deondray Gossett] Down low is only a deception when you're deceiving another person that you're in a sexual relationship with. If you're just pretending to be straight for appearances and don't have wives or girlfriends or husbands and boyfriends, but are just trying to maintain a straight appearance for social gain, then that's not deception, that's asurvival mechanism. DL with a woman: self explanatory. No one likes being deceived by a spouse or lover, no matter what the sex is of the person they're cheating on you with. This situation gets more complicated when a man cheats on a woman with a man or a woman cheats on a man with another woman. This causes feelings of inadequacy from the person being cheated on because they suddenly feel as if there's nothing they can do to compete with the opposite sex for their lover's affections. Then when you usher in the perceived HIV risks, it becomes a question of life or death. I used the word "perceived" because many of the assumptions about DL men being the primary catalyst for new cases of African American women being infected with HIV are completely false and largely unstudied. In fact, the CDC released a study late last year that stated most of these women were primarily infected while having unprotected heterosexual sex, with the second most common cause being intravenous drug use. Contracting HIV from DL men was at the bottom of the list.
Are these men living fictional lives?
[Deondray Gossett] Absolutely! They are not living their authentic selves. Contrary to political correctness, sexuality IS a big part of who we are, and not being able to express that freely stilts authenticity. DL men and women would not choose to be DL if it weren't for violence, intolerance, homophobia, and religious beliefs. If transgender, homosexuality and bisexuality were perceived just as normal as heterosexuality, we would not even be having this discussion.
In your own words, what is the DL Chronicles about and why do you feel is significant to television?
[Deondray Gossett] The DL Chronicles is about men of color who lead sexually duplicitous lives. We were angered at the way the gay community was being raked over the coals over the whole DL thing. It was never viewed as something separate from the openly gay and happy people, but rather as an offshoot or subset. At the end of the day, gays were still to blame. After all, the DL man was only the messenger of the HIV virus, not the carrier. It stigmatized gay men, damaged black men in general (because now we were all suspects), and put unnecessary fear in the hearts of African American women. We had found a scapegoat. Instead of taking an empirical look at the epidemic, we resorted to an old fashioned witch hunt where the dirty gays were to blame. It was an easy thing to take root at the time when you consider the political climate at that moment: the push for gay marriage, the division of the African American community over these issues, Bush's right-wing, religious, anti-gay views, the black church becoming very vocal about its disdain for homosexuality, gay lynching in Jamaica and Africa... the list goes on and on. The brew had already been boiling, and when the DL took center stage, African Americans were already prepped and seasoned to drink the soup straight down, no questions asked. As if this was brand new. After reading articles in the New York Times, seeing segments on Oprah, and listening to what the people were saying on the street, it became clear that something had to be done that presented another perspective and told the whole story. These articles and talk show segments did a very good job of explaining the phenomenon, but not one of them attempted to answer the most pressing question: why? This series attempts to answer that question. DL men do not arbitrarily marry women for the simple sake of deception. Many of them feel trapped, and extremely unwilling to adopt a life of "sin" or face ridicule, shame, and in some cases, violence. Also, many DL men don't even have wives or girlfriends. In many cases, they were in stable, committed relationships with other men, but pretended to be straight so as not lose their place in society, with their families and friends, or in the work place. They have a lot to gain by passing, and they assume they have a lot to lose by coming out. We did the series as an anthology because there is no singular way that one can be on the DL. Every story is a different cast, with different backgrounds, and different story arcs. We tell every perspective and attempt to cover every facet of the DL phenomenon from DL married man to the DL high school student who has never been married and who has never had a sexual encounter with another male, but knows he's different, and knows he has these desires, and has been convinced by his surroundings that he can't openly express these feelings.
How does it different from other LGBT pictures like Noah's Arc and Queer As Folk?
[Deondray Gossett] It differs from Queer as Folk in two ways: 1. It's an African American point of view, 2. And it deals mostly with men who are coming to terms with their sexuality as opposed to men who are already settled with who they are. It hasn't been studied, and this may be a huge miscalculation, but it has been my experience that a disproportionate amount African American men are still closeted when compared to their white counterparts. And I think this is because, contrary to political correctness, African Americans on the whole seem to be less tolerant of gays than their white counterparts. Again, this hasn't been studied; this is merely my own personal observation. There are a lot more outspoken anti-gay blacks per capita than whites. When you consider the US population of blacks and how many of them have come out publicly about their intolerance for gays (i.e., Tim Hardaway, Busta Rhymes, Church pastors, Ja Rule, Usher, Mos Def, 2 Pac, our family members, etc.) compared to whites who have done the same, the scale tips further on the black side. It differs from Noah's Arc in its attempt to tell the stories of those men who are often ignored and kept secret. We all know the out and proud gay man. It's the story that's getting told more and more in the white community; however, black gay media has not yet fully graduated to the out and proud phase, as a vast majority of us are still in the closet and still uncomfortable with being gay. The DL Chronicles is about the guy that is gay/bi but finds himself in circumstances that do not provide the atmosphere for him to safely come out. This is not to say that Noah's Arc doesn't have its place. It's a perfect companion to the stories of The DL Chronicles. While one helps usher DL men out of the darkness, the other celebrates freedom and self acceptance right in bold light. They are both needed as both sides of the fence still exist in significant numbers in the African American community.
Why a predominately black televised event?
[Deondray Gossett] Like it or not, the specific phrase "down low" was created by black people to denote anything that is a secret. The meaning has evolved and is now the infamous DL, which specifically references black men. Because we're trying to shed new light on the phenomenon, answer the "why's," and redefine the term, it wouldn't have been advantageous to call it "The Closet" as that encompasses more than just men of color. We wanted to tackle head-on, the very layered, very controversial DL, which specifically denotes men of color and their specific set of circumstances, backgrounds, demographics, economics, and social standing. Calling it by any other name or casting white actors in the lead roles would derail from our original intentions. This is not to say that this phenomenon is specific to black men. We know that this phenomenon is universal and crosses race, class, and socio-economics; however we've seen those shows before. Brokeback Mountain is nothing more than the DL as it applies to white men, but somehow white stories about the Closet don't carry as much weight or stigma as the term DL. We wanted to attempt to lift that stigma and tell the whole unembellished story of so many men that we know. We wanted DL stories to be understood, and taken out of the sensationalism arena.
What is the most significant episode of the televised event project and why? [Deondray Gossett] Every episode is significant. Every single one so far has had such an enormous impact on audiences across the US, Canada, South America, and the UK. Every episode dismantles a belief system or institution and turns it on its head and holds a mirror back to society and asks everyone who is watching, "What part do you play in this phenomenon?" What many don't realize is how much we all perpetuate and support the DL. The DL man is the executor, sure, but what about the homophobic society, what about the revered super-masculine male in the black culture, what about theintolerable openly gay guy who shuns everyone who is not out and proud, what about the mother who helps to raise effemophobes by carelessly throwing out phrases like, "don't be a sissy" or "Stop acting like a little girl," what about the fathers who condemn homosexuals openly to their sons as a right of passage or a form of masculine comradery, what about the pastor who preaches fire and brimstone for all sexual deviants, what about the hip hop artists who regularly call other rappers faggots as a way to demoralize and mame their reputations - the lowest form of disrespect, what about the gay guy who allows his lover to have a wife or girlfriend, what about the girl who doesn't ask for her lover's HIV status and doesn't regularly get tested, what about the gay guys who do the same? Homophobia is all around us, and we are all participants - gay or straight.
Why create such a televised event, and make it apart of your life's work?
[Deondray Gossett] If we weren't brave enough to address the issue in a meaningful way, it probably never would have been done in this manner. We know first hand about this phenomenon, and wanted to shed light on the truth, and the why's as opposed to the victim/predator stance that we are already so familiar with. It was a catharsis for us. Our wounds healed as we created and shot this show, and self love and acceptance comes out through the screen to the viewer in a way that's unthreatening, but really causes you to self-examine, and gives you some insight on how to live more authentically or shows you the consequences of living in-authentically.

Do you feel there is a difference between the men on the "DL" and"closeted" men?
[Deondray Gossett] Fundamentally, no. Culturally, yes. African American men have a separate set of social obligations and assumptions that are unique to them. For example, historically the emasculinization of African American men has done much to rip away a black man's identity and his place in society. He has been trying to find that place ever since. Today we see a phenomenon that is used as a defense mechanism, called the "cool pose". It's a kind of swagger that black men put on to preserver their masculinity and their place in society. Today we hear young kids calling it, "acting hard." It's the same thing. We see it in hip hop, on the street, in gangsters. If anything comes along that threatens this swagger and this new found place and respect in society, it has to be eliminated. It's sure and sudden social death for a black boy in the inner city to be labeled as a punk, pussy, or faggot, regardless of sexual preference. Hip hop has done a great deal epitomize black masculinity as the standard; however fictitious and unwarranted this may be, it's a great moment in time for black masculinity. It not only has found its place, but it has become the standard for American Masculinity. Now, more than ever, it's crucial to maintain this status, which is why hip hop finds itself so utterly anti-gay and homophobic- it's threatened by it because it stands to ruin everything that's been gained. Religion and black culture are so intertwined that they are almost indistinguishable from one another. There is a strong religious influence and pressure to not go against Biblical scripture and teachings. Many gay/bi black men feel that sex with another man is a sin against God, and fear the consequences of that behavior. Try as hard as they might to thwart these feelings and try to "save" themselves by marrying often find that the desire gnaws at them so strongly that they finally act on it, and before you know it, they have created a DL situation. The African American culture does little to include gay/lesbian figures in its history or its media. It's still a dark secret. However, white media has been unafraid to do this for some time. White youth seeing these images don't feel as alone or afraid of being who they are. It's only been with the creation of Noah's Arc, Punks, Brother to Brother, Dirty Laundry, and The DL Chronicles, that black gays/lesbians have been included into black society in a serious or meaningful sort of way.What has been the hardest struggle in the filming process?
[Deondray Gossett] Low Budgets and limited casting options. There are many African American actors both straight and gay who shy away from playing roles like these. Some are afraid of being type-cast (even if they are gay) while others just don't want to be thought of as gay.
In episode Wes, the first episode, it pictures a lawfully-wedded man having an affair with his brother-in-law. Why was this chosen as the pilot episode?
[Deondray Gossett] It was the episode that most resembled the scenario that people were accustomed to seeing when it came to the DL Phenomenon; however, as you watch the episode, you begin to understand the DL phenomenon from a different perspective. The story is complicated and doesn't try to choose a side. It humanizes every character involved and you get small glimpses into their minds and start to understand some of the reasons that they are all making the decisions that they're making. It was controversial on purpose. We wanted to get everyone's attention - the straits and the gays. After all, this show will do very little to change minds if we're always preaching to the choir. We had to provide something that was easily identifiable by all who watched, then once we got their attention, we began to detangle all of the misconceptions and assumptions about the DL in subsequent episodes.
The men cast in these pictures are the archetypes of attractive men. Was there a selected type of man that you were looking for in these pictures?
[Deondray Gossett] We had to cast men that were going to lure our target audiences: gay/bi men and strait women. This strategy has been very successful with getting our small and, at the time, independent film series some much needed hype. We knew going into this that we would be met with resistance from all sides on just the title alone. We were able to get people to forego the title and draw them in by the attractive lead cast members that were featured in our ad campaigns. Then once we got them in the seats, they got schooled. Not that this was supposed to be a "message" film, but it is supposed to be socially conscious, yet entertaining. You can laugh, cry, and shout, while watching the episodes, while all the while still being enlightened. We call the show "Edutainment." It's one of the best ways to administer a message without coming off so preachy and boring that people don't want to sit and listen. People have come out of our screenings with their mouths agape, not fully understanding how we packed so many messages, provided so much entertainment, and left people with so much to think about in just 30 minutes. Every decision we make about the show is calculated. Every aspect affects our decisions, from the target audience to the social climate.
In your opinion, which characters represented some of the experiences of that of you and your partner, respectively?
[Deondray Gossett] All of the characters represent us in some way or another. Each one has a small circumstance or behaves in a way that is reflective of me or Quincy, but I would say that the characters that most resemble us back when we were DL are the characters Mark (Ulrich Que) and Donte (Colbert Alembert) from episode: Mark. This is one of the only episodes that is based specifically on me and Quincy. We did the fake room thing when company or family would come visit. We would change the den into another room to pretend we were just roommates. We had family that would show up unannounced and want to spend the night, which would cause us stress because we'd have to fight over who would have to sleep in the fake room. It was ridiculous when we think back on those times, but it made perfect sense to us then, in those uncertain times when we weren't sure what coming out would do to our relationships with the people we loved; the same people who conveyed to us during our formative years their utter disdain for gay folks.
What do you think "DL" is seen as wrong in context in US pop and mainstream culture?
[Deondray Gossett] I believe that there are aspects of the DL that are wrong. No one should ever deceive or be deceived. This show never condones that kind of behavior, but sometimes we believe that an unfair emphasis gets placed on any infidelity that involves a woman and two men. Betrayal is betrayal, and it is always wrong; however when a man cheats with another man on a woman it becomes Armageddon not just a simple betrayal, and I think that unconsciously sends out hidden, negative messages. It's bigoted and a double-standard. It all stems from homophobia, hype, and the uneducated declaration that bi/gay men are passing HIV to their wives and girlfriends at an alarming rate. When in fact, it's one of the least common ways of transmission. Then there is an aspect of the DL that hurts no one but the person who is in hiding. There are a large number of men who don't involve women in their charades of heterosexuality. They are just simply trying to survive inside of this gay-hostile institution. It's simple a survival tactic, and I don't know if I could call that wrong. As an African American I used to conform to many ideals, belief systems, and social norms that I didn't have to do when I was alone at home. I did this to secure employment, get promotions, to survive. It's hard to categorize this simply as wrong. It's too complicated for such an easy categorization. I think it's necessary; however I am also aware of some of the dying you have to do in order to maintain this exterior. At some point, after living inauthentically for so long, you will begin to get so boxed in that you eventually will implode on yourself, and what's left is the real you. And once that happens, you feel completely whole, and then there's no turning back from that kind of resolution and freedom. The DL is complicated and can't be answered in short little antidotes, which again is why we had to do this series as an anthology. People like dichotomous, black and white answers to everything, but what we most often find is that there is no one answer for most questions. People are very uncomfortable with unknowns. That's why we despise the DL man so much. He's not easily identifiable. He breaks the rules. He's under the radar. He's an enigma. That bothers people.
In your experiences, what made it uncomfortable for you to just "come out"?
[Deondray Gossett] Read my answers above and add that I was also very strong in my Christian faith. I knew what the Bible said, I knew what my father felt about gays, my grandmother threatened to disown me. I had no choice, but to hide or keep the feelings in check... neither were successful.
Why don't these indivivduals just "come out?"
[Deondray Gossett] For all the reasons I said above plus the fear of being ostracized, loss of family, and sometime loss of life. People seem to forget that gays are still being attacked on the streets - google the recent attacks in Jamaica, New York, Los Angeles, Africa, Colorado, Detroit, Chicago, and Texas.
Why did you decide to "come out"?
[Deondray Gossett] I had to live authentically. When a rumor got out about me being gay to some of my closest friends, rather than deny it again, I decided to call my mother and tell her the truth. To my astonishment, she said she already knew and had known since I was a kid. After I told my mother, not much else mattered. Plus, as I said earlier, once you get a taste of your authentic self, there's no going back. It took some years to tell some other people in my family, but it got easier and easier each time, and it wasn't always accepted with open arms, but it also wasn't as traumatic as it had been for some friends of mine who had been put out of the house and disowned by their families. My family had to reconsider everything that they had previously believed about gay people. They loved me, and had to reconcile this inside of their minds in order to still be in my life.






On the right is author and media commentator, Keith Boykin. Boykin had written best-selling books on the "Down-Low"


Are there any regrets in "coming out"?
[Deondray Gossett] Not one.
What are some of the dangers of being on the "DL"?
[Deondray Gossett] Not being your true authentic self can lead to self loathing and also distance you from the people you love whether you notice it or not. After coming out, people would tell me that sometimes I would seem so guarded that they didn't really know me at all and my coming out makes us closer. Also, in the case of the DL men who have women, but sleep with other men, or vice-versa, it's never cool to be dishonest when it comes to matters of the heart. Unless there is some mutual agreement made between partners, no one should be stepping out on their relationships. As far as HIV is concerned, we should NOT be trying to figure out if people are on the DL, but rather seek out self responsibility. Even married couples, straight or gay, should periodically be getting tested for HIV. If we stay in denial about so-called marriages or committed relationships, we will continue to see HIV rates increase.
What has been the proudest moment in creating this project?
[Deondray Gossett] When my grandmother came to a screening, and came to me afterward and gave me a huge kiss and told me congratulations on a job well done. I knew that we had succeeded at what we were trying to do.
What are some of the hopes that you and your partner have in broadcasting this project?
[Deondray Gossett] We want it to spark dialogue. We want to change minds. We wish for a society where the DL no longer has to exist. It won't happen over night, but we want to do our part in pushing things in that direction.
The project has been a success and has captured the attention of Here! Now, an LGBT channel. Why broadcast on the project on Here! Now?
[Deondray Gossett] The here! channel was the only channel that was going to allow us to do the show without modifications. They were the only ones that were willing to take a chance with airing the show just as it was. They were on the same page with us since Day 1.
Any advice to men on the "DL"?
[Deondray Gossett] For the ones who are in relationships and sleeping with men on the side, I simply say get out of that relationship. It's not fair to your spouse. It doesn't mean you have to come out, but dragging someone along while you try to figure yourself out is unfair. There are other ways to keep your sexuality a secret without having a wife or a girlfriend for cover. Watch the show. It may give you insight on how to make the best transition.For those DL men who aren't involved with women, I'm not forcing you out of the closet. Only you know when it's safe to tell someone, if you ever decide to. In the meantime, watch the show. It can be a very lonely feeling when you seem to be going through this alone. You will see yourself in an episode eventually, and it may be just the thing you need to plan a course of action that could change your life.
See Fahari-Libertad original: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=161658877&blogID=354656290
Look out for the overall product of the"men on the dl" ArtVoice article soon!


Interacial Dating

Jungle Fever: The Construct of Interracial Dating
"Shhh... Say It Louder" issue
By Marcus Scott & Regina Rivers
Guest Writer & Staff Writer

All people are socialized to create factors for their ideal soul-mate and live happily ever after through the approval and guidance of others.

Designing such features and characteristics of another is a challenging yet life-altering experience because one wants to be in completion with his or her counterpart. Whatever quality or attribute that doesn’t match, it takes on the role as the balance to the relationship. Hence, the construction of interracial dating has been perpetuated in a media circus through films such as Jungle Fever and Something New. This, of course, has challenged the visage of the romantic pedigree and stereotypes idolized in romantic-comedies that states love between two people are based on both gender and ethnicity.

Those who do not fit into archetypical bullet points, are systematically alienated by the pros and cons of society and therefore, are destined for failure, and become star-crossed lovers. In English, the pursuit of happiness in romantic relationships are limited because of the stigmas that surround interracial relationships and thus, the old-age prophecy of “you can’t help who you love” is thrown into the primordial subsistence that does not live up to its accurate significance.

A superficial question that plagues humankind is the theory that society feels the need to have input in someone’s collective love life. This can range from anecdotal opinions of a few close friends to an entire metropolis.

When one chooses to date outside of their race, there is always someone who makes it his/her duty to feign on the significant other of the opposite race. According to a study on interracial dating among college students conducted by Knox et al, studies showed that Blacks were twice as likely as Whites to remain open about interracial involvement. These researchers also felt that because of the idea of tolerance for diversity and more ethnic [minority] groups enrolling into universities, college students are viewing mixed race relationships from a positive perspective.

Additionally, 92% of the participants reported to have been involved in an interracial relationship and the 32% who were not involved remain open to the possibility of an interracial relationship. The irony of such statistics is that dating outside one’s race is a non-normative behavior.

In the media, Black celebrities like actress Whoopi Goldberg, athlete Dennis Rodman and fashion designer Anita Hawkins have dated outside of their race and have had their fair share of backlash from society. In a Jet magazine interview, Goldberg stated that she has dating both inside and outside of her race,“A woman with power is a problem for any man, but particularly a Black man because it’s hard for them to get power. I understand that…”

Rodman, known for his romantic relations with Carmen Electra and Madonna, stated that Black women weren’t attracted to him when he was younger because of his lack of fashion and wealth. During his high profile basketball, Rodman states that this of course changed their perceptions of him.

Hawkins refers to herself as the ‘Rainbow Coalition of dating’ because of her experience dating with various races. Hawkins stated that she feels that a man of any race is not perfect, however, there is nothing wrong with people dating outside of their races.

In other words [or another interpretation], some critics believe that society should stop making one race of people above another with regards to perspective life partners because of the emotional aspects of love itself, because some believe that love is not based on ethnic tones. While some Black women feel that the concept of Black men dating White women is more tolerable and vice versa, others are yielding an opposite point of view.

Veronica Blakely makes this topic the focal point of her poetry in her novel, I Want What Most White Women Got: A Black Man. Blakely addresses how light-skinned Black women with White-like features are given a better portrayal in the media as opposed to the darker skinned Black women. Her book also includes a section on personal growth and improvement in dark-skinned women. In a like manner, some critics believe society should improve itself on allowing any person of any color to date whomever he/she wants. If some Blacks choose to be with Whites and, some Whites prefer to be with Blacks and so on, isn’t it possible that the feeling between the two people are legit for love and respect for one another without the complications and untidiness of discriminatory orthodox theories?

Of course some critics will disagree. In fact, according to “What's Love Got to Do With It?” by Kellina Craig-Henderson, author and professor of psychology at Howard University, Henderson found studies from a 1992 US census that shows an estimation of 246,000 interracial marriages with more than half between African-American men and White women. Craig-Henderson’s novel "Black Men in Interracial Relationships," denotes the possibility that the “color of love can be confusing” in interracial relationships stating that anger is an issue that consumes African American women possibly because of their skin tone. This can be immensely observed in music videos from Punk to Rhythm & Blues clips, with dark toned women seen as hypersexual and seductive vixens contrasting to lighter-skinned typecast angelic women used merely as girlfriends. In the music videos, these men wage wars between the racist status quo and ideological presentation of interracial relationships. Craig-Henderson states “I have seen stats that claim it's roughly 5%,” however with the increasing popularity of African American males and White women compared to the small percentage of African American women and White women, the numbers quake under the pressure to truly accept Black women as angelic and quixotic figures.

With the high-profile media on this current phenomena, there is an issue that has arisen over time and transcended through film and theatre: Interracial relationships are the perfect niche for star-crossed lovers.



References:
Blakely, V. I Want What Most White Women Got: A Black Man. Infinity Publishing Company. 2007.
Buffington, C., Hemphill, G., Knox, D., and Zusman, M. E. “Interracial Dating Attitudes among College Students.” Polling and Statistical data included. College Student Journal. March 2000.
Why Some Blacks Choose to date Outside of Their Race by Jet Magazine Sept 17, 2001
http://blacknews.com/pr/ablackman101.html
http://www.vs-voice.com/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/discussion/2006/06/08/DI2006060800820.html
http://www.whitewomenblackmen.com/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/06/05/AR2006060501102.html

Banjee Realness

Marcus Scott
The Fahari-Libertad Magazine
"Shhh... Say It Louder" issue
“Pier Queen: The Banjee Hype”

The primary colors of man—black, white, yellow, red—and all that in between has set an atonement for the like of its species, vitalizing stigmas, ignominy, chauvinism and placing predisposition on the prevaricating circumstances that influence positive change. In 21st century, the median has predisposed young minds to an obligatory settlement of prejudice, mostly beleaguered and advocated among hyphenated multitudes. Lately, the prejudice has habitually placed homosexual and people of Afro-origin under fire. Black men, those of the Americas, Caribbean and of Sub-Saharan descent have been trained pathologically to be fearless, and prepared to face problems that are collectively distilled in society such as the refusal of gaining employment. Homosexuals, particularly men who sleep with men (MSM), are faced with the anxiety of intimation of the heterosexual because they are seen as a threat to the order of the work place, let alone in club circuits or public bistro, because they are not the quintessential organization man. With this being said, why should one’s sexual orientation and ethnicity be considered in a corporate setting where one works to gain capital? With this being stated, at a time, there were no Fortune 500 companies that offered health benefits to the domestic partners of gay and lesbian workers until Levi Strauss did so in 1992.According to “Corporate America backs gay rights” by Marc Gunther, a Fortune senior writer, more than half of the Fortune 500 offer those benefits today. However, with this in mind, these rights often cater to the White homosexual young urban professional.

In fact, according to American Lawyer magazine a writer-columnist and now-infamous unidentified “maven fashionista” for Glamour Magazine, conducted theories in her presentation of corporate fashion to forty-plus New York legal representatives, to which many were appalled. In the presentation, she quotes that the afro is “a real no-no,” and that “political hairstyles have to go.” This of course came with very little comfort, and while understanding that her statements weren’t to denote treasonable circumstance but could lead to proceedings. These interesting statements were later followed with “and as for dreadlocks: how truly dreadful,” which provokes the politics of hair, inserting rudimentary doctrines of beauty onto corporate mores. Exactly what image is necessary to obtain employment and what constitutes for the idea hyphenated-marginal minorities and other unorthodox melting-pot alternatives?

The Banjee or “Pier Queen” in 21st century, is everything but ideal. With definitions on urbandictionary.com, the term is derived from Nuyorican descent and used mostly in New York City concrete jungles in the late 80s and for the duration of the 90s, to describe young Black or Latino men who have sex with men and dressed in urban glam fashion, but are not effeminate or powerless. This of course carries a weight for Banjee alike. According to “Deconstructing Banjee Realness” by Tim’m T. West, West stated that this 90s term was old school in gay years, and that in the summer of 1991, when he was resolved in his sexuality, he was defined this in his days boyscouting Christopher Street piers, where he met masculine homosexuals. Only through his experiences reading the likes of Isaac Julian's "Looking for Langston" and Marlon Riggs' "Tongues Untied," did West later appreciate “something incredibly seductive about a brotha with a lil’ sugar in his swagger.”

Regardless, the media hasn’t portrayed Banjee Realness or Pier Queens, in a positive light. With the rise of "Pomo Afro Homo" or "post-modern African American homosexuals," and that of gay marriage, a question begs to be asked. Is Gay Marriage Anti-Black? In “Is Gay Marriage Anti Black???” By Kenyon Farrow, a reply to the Feb. 29th Sunday edition of the Atlanta Journal Constitution, discusses Homophobia in Black Popular Culture, Same-sex Marriage and Racial Politics on the gay marriage debate. In it Farrow states that it is not quite the Right-wing Christian that’s been successful in using same-sex marriage as a “wedge issue” by exploiting homophobia in the black community nor racism in the gay community, but hip-hop music itself: The hip-hop image is controlled by White suburban youth, the majority that buy these records. Commercial rap aside, “Conscious” hip–hop artists has promoted homophobia through their lyrics, sparking notions adversative to what a “strong black man” should be. Dancehall artists such as Rupee, Elephant Man and TOK have also come under much criticism having featured homophobic lyrics that adress the killing of homosexuals by harsh fatality. However, little is said about lesbianism.

Concluding, many groups have often asserted a predisposed prejudice on this issue in their politics, denoting that it is more of an image quandary than a religious one. Some even point to the black church as a spread of homophobia, and while it is preached in the bible and other religious texts, this does not speak foe the entire black church. It’s rather the difficulty of seeing same-sex couples in a sensual rendezvous than a religious belief, in fact, some theorist believe that religion in itself is used as a back-up in stating that the act of same-sex sensuality is wrong. This of course denotes black sexual identity. While racism still exist in the LGBTQI circle, the idea of the sexually dangerous militant black still exists and while many desire more White features (such as Asians widening their eyes, for example), whites are seen desired universally and homosexuality is even accepted and preferred to that of Banjee individuals, because of the ideology behind the identity of the black man. The weight in which West describes is one that has many dimensions. Simply stated, a banjee must maintain his hip-hop livelihood in order to maintain his image, being respected by heterosexuals but also keeping the desired images that both White and Black effeminate men deem masculine and desirable because banjees are depicted as lustful and sexually intense.

Maybe this is why Black-Canadian cartoonist Patrick Fillion has 80% of white males in his homoerotic comics, feeling that 80% of people are more shocked by White men doing gay things than other ethnic types and with an asking price of $500-$1000 for each pictorial, its simple economics that most Whites buy more art, supplying Fillion with a lasting career. Maybe people just aren’t shocked to see to “straight-acting individuals” kissing. After all, that’s not why its become a media sensation, right?

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Calender Spotlight: Zili Misik (ArtVoice)


Zili Misik, graduates of the Berklee College of Music and a prized world music ensemble from Boston, is a coterie of virtuosos fusing blues, jazz, samba, reggae and neo-soul to create a diasporic world beat sound. Combining unique rhythms of African and Haitian roots with Latin and Jamaican tinges, Zili’s members hail from sundry locales spanning Japan to Trinidad, and as such they’ve been bringing their multi-cultural music across continents for seven years. They play one night only in WNY, at Nietszche’s on Friday (Feb. 15), with support from fellow Bostonian singer-songwriter Tony Brown, and local bands Ramforinkus and Peanut Brittle Satellite, along with Peter Burakowski of the band Shambu. The show starts at 10pm

—marcus scott

To See The Original, Go to:

http://artvoice.com/issues/v7n7/calendar_spotlight/zili_misik

Thursday, February 7, 2008

See You There: James "Blood" Ulmer (Artvoice)


No artist has paved a musical plateau to the stars quite like the critically extolled, playfully exalted South Carolinian jazz luminary James “Blood” Ulmer. With a signature look that recalls the sophistication of funk visionary George Clinton, the grainy soulfulness of B.B. King and a string-snapping sound orchestrating a rock synthesis critics have described as “the missing link between Jimi Hendrix and Wes Montgomery,” Blood has become a kind of pioneering jazz futurist. With the release of his pivotally acclaimed Bad Blood in the City: The Piety Street Sessions (Hyena), Blood has fashioned heart-wrenching vocals and resonating poetics to accompany his real-life political and cultural statements about the devastated city of New Orleans. Garnering Grammy nods, his recent record Birthright—a record adored even by nit-picking, hairsplitting faultfinders—is sure to bedazzle jazz lovers. “Blood’s” intimate one-night only performance as part of the 2007-08 Hunt Real Estate Art of Jazz Series is to be heralded by “The Geography of the Blues,” a pre-concert conversation with Jim Santella at 7pm.


Saturday, February 9 at 8pm. Albright-Knox Art Gallery, 1285 Elmwood
Avenue. $22 general, $18 members.
For reservations call (716) 270-822


To see the full link: http://artvoice.com/issues/v7n6/see_you_there/james_blood_ulmer

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Marcus Scott's Steph Jones Interview (Nu-Soul Magazine)


Fast Times with Steph Jones By Marcus Scott

Revitalizing, magnetic, and as tranquilly sophisticated and engaging as a coffee table book, this avant-garde face to soul music has honed his skills, polishing radio tunes like Disturbing Tha Peace’s “Celebrity Chick” featuring Ludacris, Chingy, and Small World on the compilation Strength In Numbers. With his raspy, airy and passionate falsetto, Steph Jones, the Mo City Alien, is looking to turn heads with his with studio album Mr. Ordinary. Using his stereo and his records to perform a music séance to inspire him, this former Ford Model called upon the finesse of Old School favorites like Marvin Gaye, Ray Charles and Al Green to create his 2008 studio debut. Using old school jazz, soul, and quiet storm sensibilities with a hip-hop swagger and new jack swing, this certified nu-soul artist and self-classified music raconteur is a musical oddity all of his own.
Nu-Soul: How hard was it transitioning from Ford Model to singer-songwriter?
Steph Jones: It was hard. I was actually trying to sing while I was modeling, but no one would take me seriously. After I got out of jail, I told myself that I would focus on my music and forget about the modeling for now. What I did. And that’s what I’m doing.

Nu-Soul: As a child you were Houston-born and raised in Missouri City, how have both the music cultures in both environments influenced your sound?
Steph Jones: It wasn’t the music in my surroundings, basically it was the music played inside my house. It wasn’t the music induced in an area, because I was grounded and never had to go outside. My mother was a deejay and that was the music that influenced me, whatever she played that’s what influenced me whether I knew it or not because I didn’t grow up wanting to be a singer.

Nu-Soul: You said your mother was a deejay growing up. What was your father?
Steph Jones: My dad was a drug dealer and he was murdered when I was 12.

Nu-Soul: So, what did you want to be growing up?
Steph Jones: What I was doing. I was an athlete. I ran track and I still train right now, and I didn’t know that I wanted to be a singer 100% until I got to college. You know, eventually every time you hear shut up every time you open your mouth, you get a little self-conscious about it.

Nu-Soul: You began singing in college; can you tell me some of the experiences?
Steph Jones: Pretty much, once I got on my own and no one could tell me to shut up, that’s when I started doing karaoke and experimenting with the likes of Joe, 50 Cent, The Beatles and The Dixie Chicks, I didn’t care. It was my way of expressing what’s been inside of me so long, but I didn’t know the feeling until I actually made somebody cry while I was singing karaoke. I was like, “Yeah, this is definitely what I want to do.”

Nu-Soul: What college did you go to?Steph Jones: Barton County Community College in Kansas for a semester, then to Santa Monica College. My major in college was psychology.

Nu-Soul: With spots on the DL Chronicles and other shows, the song “Mr. Ordinary,” it’s been very popular among indie crowds, underground crowds and enjoying much success.
Steph Jones: Definitely.

Nu-Soul: So, Why was the Jay-Z dub added to the song?
Steph Jones: Actually it’s not even on my album. The Jay-Z Part, that’s just the mix tape version that was just, pretty much, to capture the attention of a certain genre that normally wouldn’t listen to my style of music. So, when you put Jay-Z right there, they’ll be like “Oh, what is that?” It’s like “ATTENTION!” And that’s the version that everyone has.

Nu-Soul: On a personal note, I’m an avid fan of “Melody To Snap To.”
Steph Jones: Actually, I wrote that while I was in jail. I spent two years. Twenty-Five months in a French prison. I got out about two years ago. It took me like 7 to 7 ½ months to get a deal, and now I am where I am today.

Nu-Soul: What inspired you to write that song?
Steph Jones: I mean, that the fact that I was in jail, and every day I saw the Iraqi fighting with the Africans, and it’s like the same thing you see on CNN. Its like, “Man, if only the world was all on the same rhythm, on the same page.” That will never happen, but it would be like, “What if?” The world needs a melody to snap to.

Nu-Soul: With that, we haven’t seen this album…Steph Jones: My album is due this spring, and the single is not “Mr. Ordinary.” It’s called “La La it means love,” produced by Tricky Stewart and written by me and Dream. That will be out the second week of January, and nobody has heard it.

Nu-Soul: Why so late? “Mr. Ordinary” and “Melody To Snap To” have been on your page for quite sometime, were there any mishaps or setbacks with the album?
Steph Jones: No, there were no setbacks. Everything’s all about timing. Because I’m a new artist and with my type of music, I’m not the type of artist that you can just throw out there. It’s all about the proper set up and it’s all about the timing but you can just throw out a lot of different sounds, but some people maybe might be confused and won’t get it. When you work underground markets like MySpace, AOL and Yahoo, and prepare people for what’s about to come then they are much more accepting than if you just threw me out there. The last half of the year, I had the “Celebrity Chick” record come out that wasn’t for my talent but for the look coming out next to Chingy, next to Ludacris and my single was going to drop which is frickin’ crazy. I was in Houston on 93.3, and I called Shock and they aired it. He said, “You can play it on the air, but you can’t give it to them.” They played it three times, and so many people called about that song. It was crazy, and they weren’t even telling people to call. They were like, “Yo! What’s that?” They’ve been hitting me up ever since: “You should get La La on your page.” (laughs) My album is an honest album. It’s very, very, very honest. The songs on my page, if you follow the music, the Steph Jones movement because of the songs on my page, those are just teasers. It’s a very solid album, one through twelve.

Nu-Soul: Are you working any jobs until the album drops?
Steph Jones: Yes, I’ve done a few modeling gigs on the side.

Nu-Soul: Did you feel you put your lifeblood in that album?Steph Jones: Of course, anytime I do anything with music, I do that.

Nu-Soul: You had an experience with “Celebrity Chick,” which few new artists get. You can imagine that working with Chingy and working with other southern rappers like Ludacris is a rare opportunity. How was this experience, how has it shaped your craft in music and the record to be released in January?
Steph Jones: Pretty much like what I’ve been doing before I was signed. I never paid attention to the radio, I never played into that because you can lose yourself in all that. When I don’t pay attention to how it’s doing on TRL or 106 & Park, then it’s easier for me to pay attention to my craft because my mind is not elsewhere.

Nu-Soul: Did you ever feel like you had to change your sound to sell to bigger crowds?
Steph Jones: Considered that I’m a new artist, I haven’t put out any records, and the disadvantage of it is that I don’t have a particular sound. My sound, it you were to get specific with it, its feel-good music. If a song comes to me, I’m not gonna be like “What are these people gonna say?” I’m not a very self-contained artist. Steph Jones makes music from his heart and from his soul. At the end of the day, real recognizes real.

Nu-Soul: You draw a lot of comparisons to a lot of neo-soul artists like Maxwell and D’Angelo. Has Neo-soul played a part in your music?
Steph Jones: Oh yeah. The thing is, I love music. I love Hip-Hop, I love Country. I am music. You can put me in a box, that’s why they call me the Mo City Alien because when I grew up I had so many different thoughts. Everybody called me weird, extraterrestrial and alien. As Chaka would say, “You can’t call me Pop because I sell R&B records, you can’t call me R&B because I have Pop.”

Nu-Soul: In interviews, you’ve said that you’ve drawn influences from artists like Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder, Bob Marley, Frank Sinatra, and Etta James. How have these artists influenced you to be the artist that you have become and by far who is the most influencial artist?
Steph Jones: That’s a really hard question because when you hear my music you’ll hear pretty much all my influences. One, when you hear my album you’ll be like, “You can definitely tell this dude listens to Prince, and you can definitely tell this man listens to Stevie Wonder, Donny Hathaway, Frank Sinatra.” You can hear all of that in my music. The people that I study the most are Stevie Wonder and The Beatles.

Nu-Soul: What is it about these artists that influence your sound?
Steph Jones: Their wordplay, their melodies. I’m really intrigued by colorful melodies. Feel-good songs. Sad songs. I have a song called, “Look what you’ve done.” It’s a sad song, but it feels good in a melancholy-type of feel.

Nu-Soul: Your music has been placed in several categories. Where would you category your music if you had to choose?
Steph Jones: If I had to choose? R&B-Alternative-Soul-Pop. Not today’s R&B, I’m talking about back-in-the-day R&B, like when everyone had their own personalities. Like Marvin Gaye was different than Al Green, or different than Michael Jackson, or different than Frank Sinatra. I’m talking about that type of R&B.

Nu-Soul: On the album, were you going from a different vibe?
Steph Jones: This is why I named the album, “Mr. Ordinary.” Because at the end of the day, I didn’t have to go out of my way to do something. This is my everyday thing, and at the end of the day this is my ordinary. I wasn’t trying to go for a certain sound; I just put the music out. How it comes in, that’s how it comes out.

Nu-Soul: How passionate are you about maintaining your individuality in the music industry that’s more focused on image than beats and wordplay?
Steph Jones: You can’t have one without the other. I feel that if you can find a way to blend the two and make your music relatable. I think you can win, I know you can win.
To See The Original Article, Go to: http://blog.nu-soulmag.com/?p=112
To Learn more about Stph Jones, please visit: www.myspace.com/stephjones2